Article Sidebar

Submitted
29 April 2022
Accepted
6 June 2022
Published
30 June 2022
Download
Pdf (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 571 Download : 968

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article proposes a theological construction of Jesus’ ethical attitude towards divorce. The conflict between the socio-political practice that legalizes divorce and the narrative of religious rhetoric against divorce is the cause of many divorces in Christian families. An understanding of the ethical morality of Christians towards divorce shows that there is an excessive adherence to the biblical text without considering the context. I use hermeneutic principles through the dialectic of the text and the context of the Gospel of Matthew 19:1-9 as the method used by Jesus to understand the reality of the Torah text. This effort aims to assist Pastors in pastoral care when accompanying families who are about to divorce. This article uses a literature research method with a text centred (synchronic) approach and a qualitative method to examine the results of field research. The results showed that the text of Matthew 19:1-9 was about to criticize the attitude of Pharisees who wanted to trap Jesus through the question of divorce. It turns out that Jesus has His own Halakhah, that is, forgiveness to avoid divorce.

Keywords

etika Kristen hermeneutik pengampunan perceraian Yesus Perceraian, Pengampunan, Etika Kristen, Hermeneutik, Yesus

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi dan Misi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi dan Misi agree to the following terms:
1. The author holds the copyright and grants to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as this can result in a productive exchange, as well as earlier and larger citations of the published work (See Effects of Access Open).

References

  1. Abasili, Alexander Izuchukwu. The Understanding of Adultery in the Hebrew Bible: A Critical Survey. Xlibris Corporation, 2016.
  2. Barbara Aland, Kurt Aland, Johannes Karavidopoulos. Carlo M. Martini, and Bruce M. Metzger, ed. PERJANJIAN BARU Indonesia - Yunani. Edisi 3. Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia, 2018.
  3. BPS Sulawesi Utara. Provinsi Sulawesi Utara Dalam Angka 2021. Edited by Bidang Integrasi Pengolahan dan Diseminasi Statistik. Manado, Sulawesi Utara: BPS Provinsi Sulawesi Utara, 2021.
  4. Browning, W R F. Kamus Alkitab (Hc). BPK Gunung Mulia, 2007.
  5. Carson, Matthew A, Mark Walter W Wessel, Luke Walter L Liefeld, and T H E Expositor S. “Matthew, Mark, Luke.” The Expositor’s Bible Commentary 8 (1984): 1080.
  6. Citra, Riza Yulia, and Zafri Zafri. “Pengembangan Handout Pendekatan Sinkronik Pada Pembelajaran Sejarah Mahasiswa Jurusan Sejarah FIS Universitas Negeri Padang.” Jurnal Kronologi 2, no. 4 (2020): 9–14.
  7. France, Richard T. The Gospel of Matthew. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2007.
  8. GMIM, BPMS. Buku Kerja. Edited by BPMS GMIM. Tomohon: Sinode GMIM, 2021.
  9. GMIM, Sinode. Tata Gereja : Gereja Masehi Injili Di Minahasa 2016. Edited by BPMS GMIM. Tomohon: Sinode GMIM, 2016.
  10. Heaster, Duncan. “Verse by Verse Commentary on Gospel of Matthew” (2014): 1–1695.
  11. Heer, Drs.J.J. de. INJIL MATIUS Pasal 1-22. Edited by Staff Redaksi BPK Gunung Mulia. 1st ed. Jakarta: 1982, 2008.
  12. Instone-Brewer, David. Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible: The Social and Literary Context. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2002.
  13. Maiaweng, Peniel C D. “Perceraian Dan Pernikahan Kembali.” Jurnal Jaffray 15, no. 1 (2017): 97–114.
  14. Newman, Barclay M. Kamus Yunani-Indonesia. BPK Gunung Mulia, 1996.
  15. Norton, David, Andrew Brotherwood, and Rosemary Smart. Margaret Davies. Bmj, 2021.
  16. PENGADILAN AGAMA MANADO KELAS IA. “Prosedur Pengajuan Perkara Cerai Gugat.” MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA PENGADILAN AGAMA MANADO KELAS IA.
  17. Prof. DR. Lexy J. Moleong, M.A. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi revi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018, 2018.
  18. Putra, Adi. “Problematika Teks Dan Makna Matius 19: 9.” Missio Ecclesiae 9, no. 2 (2020): 1–16.
  19. Schafer, Ruth, and Freshia Aprilyn Ross. “Bercerai Boleh Atau Tidak.” Tafsiran terhadap Teks-teks Perjanjian Baru. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia (2017).
  20. Sigal, Phillip. The Halakhah of Jesus of Nazareth According to the Gospel of Matthew. Society of Biblical Lit, 2007.
  21. Stevanus, Kalis. “Sikap Etis Gereja Terhadap Perceraian Dan Pernikahan Kembali.” Kurios 4, no. 2 (2018): 135.
  22. Sudaryanto, Sudaryanto. “KAMUS BESAR BAHASA INDONESIA EDISI KELIMA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA (PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN BAHASA).” Lateralisasi 8, no. 2 (2020): 92–99.
  23. Surbakti, Pelita Hati. “Jangan Menceraikan Istri Yang Berzinah: Penafsiran Terhadap Matius 19: 9.” Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat 4, no. 1 (2020): 79–91.
  24. Weren, Wim. “The History and Social Setting of the Matthean Community.” In Matthew and the Didache, 51–62. Brill, 2005.