Peer-Review Process
1. The review was conducted by double-blind review. The reviewer does not know who the author of the article being reviewed is. Vice versa, the author does not know who reviewed the article.
2. Articles that get recommendations from reviewers (revisions) will be returned to the authors for revision. The results of the author's revision will be continued to the second review in the same way. If the second reviewer recommends revision, it is returned to the author.
3. Reviewers and editors registered with Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi dan Misi can still submit articles. The editor will continue to conduct a double-blind review in accordance with the applicable provisions in the Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi dan Misi.
4. The Editor in Chief can still review articles by paying attention to their expertise.
5. Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi dan Misi accepts reviewers provided that they have experience writing in several national journals indexed by Google Scholar, for at least the past five years.

Reviewer's Task

Contribute to Editor
Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.

Objectivity Standard
The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not appropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers should also call the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer-review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or relationship with any of the authors, companies, or institutions to which the paper is linked.